Defying Victorian norms, Bly's icon pioneered immersive journalism while exposing asylum horrors and workplace inequality with raw authenticity. Her innovative reporting style didn't just document - it sparked reforms by making readers feel visceral outrage. Her radical premise: truth requires walking in others' shoes.
Around the World in Seventy-Two Days: And Other Writings by Nellie Bly is more than a travelogue; it is a testament to the audacity and relentless spirit of Elizabeth Cochrane Seaman, better known as Nellie Bly. The book, published in 1890, chronicles Bly's solo journey around the globe, a feat designed to beat the fictional record set by Jules Verne’s Phileas Fogg. Is it merely a recounting of her travels, or does it represent something more profound about ambition, gender, and the pursuit of the seemingly impossible during the Gilded Age? \n \n The first serialized accounts of Bly’s adventure appeared in The New York World in November 1889, captivating readers with their immediacy and grit. The late 19th century was an era of burgeoning industrialization, global exploration, and intense societal changes—a time when the world felt both vast and increasingly interconnected. Bly's race against time resonated deeply in an age obsessed with speed, progress, and the shrinking of geographical boundaries. The voyage commenced amidst fervent speculation and wagerings, transforming Bly into a symbol of American ingenuity and female emancipation. \n \n Bly’s narrative extends beyond mere geography. It touches upon the burgeoning power of the press, the evolving role of women in society, and the allure of adventure. The book has been interpreted as cultural commentary, a celebration of progress, and a subtle critique of the constraints imposed upon women. Did Bly consciously craft her journey as an act of rebellion, or was she simply a journalist seizing an extraordinary opportunity? Anecdotes of her encounters in England, Egypt, Ceylon, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan, hint at a character both observant and opinionated. \n \n Today, Around the World in Seventy-Two Days remains a powerful symbol of unyielding determination and pioneering spirit. It inspires readers to questi
on limitations and defy expectations. The journey continues to be referenced in literature, film, and even in modern-day attempts to break travel records, serving as both a historical marker and a source of timeless inspiration. But what truly propelled Nellie Bly: a thirst for adventure, a drive for journalistic recognition, or something still deeper that resonates across the ages?
Nellie Bly’s Around the World in Seventy-Two Days: And Other Writings resonates deeply with philosophical inquiries about the nature of truth, reality, and the human capacity for understanding. Bly's race against the clock illuminates the tension between subjective experience and objective reality. Her observations raise the question of "'Reality is what we experience, not what lies beyond our experience.'" Bly's account, deeply personal and shaped by her own perceptions, highlights how our individual realities are constructed through experience. While the world exists independently of her journey, it is through that individual journey that the world's reality is revealed to the reader. \n \n Furthermore, Bly’s remarkable feat prompts reflection on the reliability of personal experience as opposed to expert knowledge. The question “‘Personal experience is more trustworthy than expert knowledge’" is tested by contrasting Bly’s on-the-ground reporting with the established geographical and logistical knowledge of her time. Bly's ability to navigate diverse cultures and overcome unforeseen challenges using her own initiative challenges the notion that expert knowledge is always superior. This speaks to a broader theme of the value of firsthand accounts, which can reveal truths inaccessible through abstract expertise. Such personal accounts help to either develop or change pre-existing views with that knowledge through personal experiences. \n \n Furthermore, her journey can also be viewed through the lens of time, as the question "'Is time more like a line or a circle?'" arises when considering how Bly’s journey compresses and challenges conventional notions of time and distance. She seeks to conquer the linear constraints of time by circumnavigating the globe, yet also experiences time cyclically. Further, the time it took to move physically from one point to another,
compared to now begs the question “‘What was true 1000 years ago is still true today.’" Through the physical restraints and challenges that came with travel compared with the travel we know in the modern say are drastically different in the 1000 years between then and now. It also brings up the question of how much has changed, or stayed true to the accounts and places she has captured through out her journey. \n \n The philosophical challenge becomes even more acute, as there were many things that would have been impossible for Bly (and other people) to truly understand at that time. As the question asks, "'There are some truths humans will never be able to understand'’" and Bly's account, despite its groundbreaking nature, is inevitably limited by the horizons of her time. The limits of her experience begs the question, especially regarding her social and cultural views. While her journey expanded geographical understanding, certain cultural perspectives may remain bounded by the societal norms of her era. Though Bly's actions help to break some norms, her account remains limited. \n \n Moreover, Bly’s quest for speed and efficiency brings to the forefront the value of “'Is there more to truth than usefulness?'" Bly’s journey, driven by a clear objective—to break the record—is undeniably useful. But her reporting also probes deeper, exploring the cultures and lives she encounters along the way. This suggests, though, that the value of her undertaking lies not only in breaking the record but also in the broader understanding she provides, implying that truth extends beyond mere utility. It raises the question if her journey was more useful, or if the truth that was captured matters more. \n \n Finally, her daring endeavor also begs the question of "'Should we prioritize equality or excellence?'" Bly's pursuit of record-breaking speed is an act of individual excel
lence. At the same time, her writing brought about a greater sense of understanding through a common shared humanity across diverse cultures. Her account becomes one of collective learning and awareness, suggesting a balance between individual aspirations and the broader goal of social equity. Bly's experience, therefore, serves as a mirror that helps to reflect upon fundamental questions about the nature of reality, the reliability of experience, and the intricate relationship between truth, utility, and social progress.
New York City
United States