Questioning certainty, Augustine's radical skepticism predates Descartes by 1000+ years. His "Against the Academics" dismantles claims of absolute knowledge, arguing even basic sensory data could deceive us. Yet he finds liberation in doubt - true wisdom starts by accepting our limitations. A refreshing antidote to today's polarized certainties.
Against the Academics by Augustine of Hippo, also known as Contra Academicos, represents more than a philosophical dialogue; it is a gateway into the soul of a man grappling with skepticism on the precipice of conversion. Penned in Cassiciacum in late 386 AD, shortly after Augustine's resignation from his teaching post and preceding his baptism, it embodies a pivotal moment in intellectual history where classical philosophy encounters nascent Christian thought. \n \n The dialogue, composed of three books, unfolds within the cultivated retreat offered by Verecundus' estate. These discussions, featuring Augustine, his mother Monica, his brother Navigius, and close friends Trygetius and Licentius, delve into the merits and pitfalls of Academic skepticism, a dominant school of thought in Roman intellectual circles. Augustine directs his focus on piercing the claims of the New Academy, which asserted the impossibility of certain knowledge, a position he found both intellectually unsatisfying and spiritually perilous. The work must be understood, not independently, but next to his other works written alongside it, "On the Happy Life" and "On Order". \n \n Over the centuries, Against the Academics has been interpreted through various lenses, serving as both a defense for faith-based truth and a testament to the enduring power of reason. Though seemingly eclipsed by Augustine's later theological works, its significance lies in reflecting Augustine's early philosophical development and providing an important window into the fusion of Platonic thought and Christian doctrine. It stands therefore as a testament to the complex interplay between doubt and belief and the quest for ultimate fulfillment of the human soul. What does Augustine's early engagement with skepticism tell us about the trajectory of his faith and the enduring tension between reason and revelation?
Augustine's Against the Academics grapples with the pursuit of truth and the reliability of human knowledge, themes that resonate profoundly with many of the questions presented. The work, in its essence, is a defense of the possibility of attaining certainty, a stance that immediately aligns with the query, "'There are some truths humans will never be able to understand.'" Augustine, through his characters, argues against the Academic Skeptics who doubted the possibility of certain knowledge. Implicitly, he rejects the notion that some truths are forever beyond our grasp, although he concedes that attaining those truths may require divine assistance or illumination. This necessity leads to considerations of whether "'Pure logical thinking can reveal truths about reality,'" a possibility Augustine initially explores but ultimately finds insufficient without faith. \n \n The role of faith, in turn, begs the question, "'Should faith seek understanding?'" Augustine's own trajectory, from skepticism towards Christian belief, exemplifies a journey where faith actively seeks understanding. He doesn't advocate for blind faith but rather a faith that strives to comprehend the truths it accepts. This resonates with the question, "'Is doubt part of authentic faith?'" Augustine’s own struggles with doubt, evident in his Confessions and implicitly present in his engagement with skepticism in Against the Academics, suggest that doubt is not necessarily antithetical to faith, but rather a catalyst for deeper inquiry and understanding. He viewed doubt as a phase to move through, not a permanent state of being, and uses arguments and logic to confront and ultimately overcome that doubt. \n \n Further scrutinizing the nature of truth, the question "'Is truth more like a map we draw or a territory we explore?'" directly relates to the Academic Skeptic's claim that we cannot ascertain
the truth. Against the Academics indicates that Augustine leaned towards truth being more of a territory to be explored, albeit with divine guidance. Our minds are not simply creating the truth, as the Skeptics suggest, but rather discovering a pre-existing reality. However, our understanding of that reality is undoubtedly shaped by our perspective and the tools of reason and faith at our disposal, forming something akin to the "map" aspect in the question. Yet Augustine firmly believed that this exploration could lead to genuine and reliable knowledge. \n \n Deeper into Augustine's epistemology, we find relevance to questions of certainty. Augustine counters the skeptics by proposing that even if our senses can deceive us, and our reasoning falter, there are foundational truths, such as mathematical truths, that remain unassailable. This position engages the notion, "'You need to be completely certain about something to truly know it.'" Augustine, in his arguments, implies that absolute certainty is indeed a necessary condition for knowledge, though he acknowledges challenges in achieving it. The skeptic's constant emphasis on doubt is the very thing which Augustine's Against the Academics is fighting against. \n \n The discussion about the attainment of truth raises the question of whether "'Personal experience is more trustworthy than expert knowledge.'" While Augustine valued reason and intellectual inquiry, he also recognized the importance of personal experience, particularly in the context of spiritual transformation. His own conversion was rooted in a profound personal experience that shaped his understanding of truth and his subsequent intellectual endeavors. \n \n Ultimately, Augustine's Against the Academics is an enduring testament to the human quest for truth, a quest that engages reason, faith, experience, and a persistent wrestling with doubt. The q
uestions presented above are echoes of the very concerns that drove Augustine's intellectual journey, highlighting the timeless relevance of his work for anyone grappling with the fundamental questions of knowledge, belief, and reality.
Milan
Italy