id: 0b3c9a05-e818-466b-a0b4-865c160360bf
slug:
illustration: https://myeyoafugkrkwcnfedlu.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/Icon_Images/William-MacAskill.png
randomizer: 0.182086619
created_at: 2025-04-25 04:34:02.346611+00
about: Pioneering concepts of "longtermism," MacAskill's icon status stems from daring to value future generations as much as our own - a radical challenge to humanity's present bias. His insight that small actions today could impact trillions of future lives revolutionizes how we view ethics and legacy.
introduction: William MacAskill (born 24 March 1987) is a Scottish philosopher, ethicist, and prominent figure in the effective altruism movement who has fundamentally reshaped modern approaches to philanthropy and ethical living. As an Associate Professor in Philosophy at the University of Oxford and co-founder of several influential organizations, MacAskill has emerged as one of the most compelling moral philosophers of the 21st century. \n \n First coming to prominence during his studies at Cambridge and Oxford in the late 2000s, MacAskill, alongside philosophers like Peter Singer and Toby Ord, began developing the framework for what would become effective altruism—a philosophical and social movement that applies evidence and reason to determine the most effective ways to benefit others. His early work coincided with a growing disillusionment with traditional charitable giving, as studies revealed the varying effectiveness of different interventions. \n \n MacAskill's influence expanded dramatically with the publication of his books "Doing Good Better" (2015) and "What We Owe The Future" (2022), which introduced revolutionary concepts about moral obligation and longtermism—the view that positively influencing the long-term future is a key moral priority. He co-founded organizations that would reshape modern philanthropy, including Giving What We Can, 80,000 Hours, and the Centre for Effective Altruism. These institutions have influenced the allocation of hundreds of millions of dollars in charitable giving and career choices of thousands of individuals. \n \n The philosophical implications of MacAskill's work extend far beyond charitable giving, touching on fundamental questions about moral responsibility, existential risk, and humanity's obligations to future generations. His ideas have attracted both passionate supporters and critics, sparking debates about the role of quantification in moral decision-making and the balance between immediate and long-term ethic
al priorities. MacAskill's personal commitment to his principles—including his pledge to donate a significant portion of his income to effective causes—has made him not just a theoretical architect but a living embodiment of the movement he helped create. \n \n As concerns about global challenges mount and questions of ethical responsibility become increasingly urgent, MacAskill's framework for systematic moral reasoning continues to influence how individuals and institutions approach their obligations to humanity, both present and future. His work raises profound questions about how we might best use our resources and opportunities to benefit others, challenging us to consider not just how to do good, but how to do the most good possible.
Notion_URL:
anecdotes: ["After living on £18,000 per year despite higher earnings, he donated all excess income for over a decade to effective charities.","At age 21, founded a rapidly-growing ethical movement at Oxford University that has since influenced billions in charitable giving.","Deliberately experimented with sleeping on floors and eating bland food to test if luxury items truly increased happiness."]
great_conversation: William MacAskill's philosophical contributions represent a pivotal intersection of ethics, rationality, and global impact in contemporary moral thought. His work fundamentally grapples with how we can maximize positive impact in an increasingly complex world, challenging traditional approaches to moral philosophy by emphasizing quantifiable outcomes and long-term thinking. As a key figure in the effective altruism movement, MacAskill's framework addresses the deep tension between individual action and collective welfare, particularly exploring whether we should prioritize reducing suffering or increasing happiness in our moral calculations.\n \n MacAskill's philosophy confronts the challenging question of whether ends can justify means, especially in the context of global poverty and existential risks. His approach to ethics is distinctly consequentialist, suggesting that we should judge actions primarily by their outcomes rather than their intentions. This position raises important questions about whether personal loyalty should override universal moral rules, and how we might balance individual rights with collective welfare.\n \n His work on longtermism particularly challenges our temporal moral horizons, arguing that future generations should matter as much as present ones. This perspective forces us to confront whether we can have meaningful moral obligations to people who don't yet exist, and whether perfect justice is worth any price when considered across vast timeframes. MacAskill's thinking also intersects with questions about whether moral truth is objective or relative to cultures, suggesting that while cultural contexts matter, certain moral truths might transcend cultural boundaries.\n \n MacAskill's approach to knowledge and certainty is notably empirical and probabilistic. He embraces the idea that pure logical thinking can reveal truths about reality while acknowledging that perfect certainty is rarely achievable in ethical deci
sion-making. His work demonstrates that wisdom is often more about questions than answers, particularly when dealing with complex global challenges and long-term consequences.\n \n In addressing whether we should prioritize local or global justice, MacAskill consistently argues for a cosmopolitan view that transcends national boundaries. His philosophy challenges traditional notions of political obligation and questions whether patriotism should be considered a virtue when compared to universal moral obligations. This connects to broader questions about whether borders should exist in an ideal world and how we should balance stability against perfect justice.\n \n MacAskill's thinking on artificial intelligence and technology raises important questions about whether AI could truly understand human emotions and whether enhancing human capabilities through technology is ethical. His work suggests that while technological progress presents risks, it also offers unprecedented opportunities to improve human welfare and reduce suffering on a global scale.\n \n This integration of practical ethics with philosophical rigor makes MacAskill's contributions particularly relevant to contemporary moral challenges. His approach demonstrates that while some truths might be beyond human understanding, we can still make meaningful progress in addressing global challenges through careful reasoning and evidence-based action. His work continues to influence discussions about how individuals can make a significant positive impact in an increasingly interconnected world.
one_line: Philosopher, Oxford, UK (21st century)