Sextus Empiricus
Demolishing academia's pillars, this ancient Greek icon showed why professors might be the last people you should trust. Sextus Empiricus argued that experts are trapped by their own certainties, while true wisdom comes from embracing doubt. His radical skepticism exposes how intellectual authority often breeds ignorance—a lesson even more vital in today's expert-obsessed world.
Against Professors (Adversus Mathematicos), written by the Greek philosopher Sextus Empiricus in the late 2nd or early 3rd century CE, stands as one of the most comprehensive surviving accounts of ancient Greek skepticism and a systematic critique of dogmatic knowledge claims across various disciplines. This monumental work, comprising eleven books, represents the culmination of Pyrrhonian skeptical thought and provides an invaluable window into both skeptical philosophy and the intellectual landscape of the Hellenistic period. \n \n The text emerged during a time of significant philosophical tension in the Roman Empire, when various schools of thought competed for intellectual supremacy. Written in Greek, Against Professors specifically targets what Sextus terms the "professors" or specialists in six liberal arts (grammar, rhetoric, geometry, arithmetic, astrology, and music) as well as logicians, physicists, and ethicists. The work's precise dating remains contested, though scholars generally place its composition between 180-210 CE, during a period of relative peace and cultural flourishing under the Severan dynasty. \n \n Sextus Empiricus's approach in Against Professors is remarkable for its methodical dismantling of accepted knowledge systems while simultaneously preserving invaluable information about the doctrines he critiques. The text employs a sophisticated argumentative strategy known as "oppositional equipollence," where competing claims are shown to be equally persuasive, leading to suspension of judgment (epochē). This approach has influenced skeptical thought throughout history, from Renaissance philosophers like Michel de Montaigne to modern epistemological debates. \n \n The work's enduring legacy lies not only in its skeptical methodology but also in its role as a crucial source for understanding ancient scientific and philosophical theories that
might otherwise have been lost to history. Contemporary scholars continue to mine Against Professors for insights into ancient educational practices, scientific theories, and philosophical debates. The text's relevance persists in modern discussions about the limits of knowledge, the nature of expertise, and the relationship between skepticism and intellectual inquiry. How might Sextus's ancient critique of specialized knowledge inform our understanding of expert authority in today's increasingly complex world?
Sextus Empiricus's "Against Professors" resonates deeply with contemporary questions about knowledge, truth, and certainty. His skeptical approach challenges fundamental assumptions about how we acquire and validate knowledge, particularly relevant to questions about whether perfect knowledge can eliminate mystery or if complete certainty is ever possible. The text's systematic dismantling of dogmatic positions across various disciplines reflects broader epistemological concerns about whether pure logical thinking can reveal truths about reality. \n \n The work's engagement with academic disciplines parallels modern debates about whether science could eventually explain everything about human consciousness or if some truths will forever remain beyond human understanding. Sextus's skeptical method highlights the tension between personal experience and expert knowledge, questioning whether tradition should limit interpretation and if ancient wisdom is more reliable than modern science. \n \n His treatment of mathematical and logical truths raises profound questions about whether mathematics is discovered or invented, and if numbers would exist even if humans never invented counting. The text's exploration of sense perception and reality connects to contemporary discussions about whether we see reality or just our expectations, and if consciousness is fundamental to reality. \n \n Sextus's approach to religious and philosophical knowledge particularly challenges whether finite minds can grasp infinite truth, and if some knowledge requires a leap of faith. His work questions whether reality is what we experience or what lies beyond our experience, relating to modern debates about whether truth is more like a map we draw or a territory we explore. \n \n The text's examination of artistic and aesthetic judgments connects to questions about whether beauty can exist witho
ut an observer, and if order exists in nature or just in our minds. Sextus's skeptical treatment of artistic evaluation parallels contemporary discussions about whether beauty is cultural or universal, and if understanding an artwork's context changes its beauty. \n \n His methodology of systematic doubt anticipates modern questions about whether skepticism is better than trust when encountering new ideas, and if personal experience is more trustworthy than expert knowledge. The text's exploration of contradictions in human knowledge systems relates to whether something can be simultaneously true and false, and if reality is fundamentally good. \n \n "Against Professors" challenges the foundation of professional knowledge, raising questions about whether perfect objectivity is possible and if we can ever truly understand how anyone else experiences the world. The text's enduring relevance lies in its demonstration that questioning accepted truths and maintaining skeptical inquiry remains crucial for intellectual progress, while simultaneously highlighting the limits of human knowledge and the complexity of determining what constitutes truth. \n \n This ancient text continues to provoke essential questions about the nature of knowledge, truth, and certainty, demonstrating that philosophical skepticism remains a vital tool for examining contemporary epistemological challenges. Its systematic questioning of established knowledge frameworks remains relevant to modern debates about the nature of truth, reality, and human understanding.
Unknown