Challenging Victorian certainty, this icon exposes how technological progress breeds hubris - showing that precise schedules and mechanized travel can't conquer human nature or cultural complexity. His prescient critique of colonial arrogance resonates today as we grapple with globalization's limits and our illusion of controlling time itself.
Around the World in Eighty Days, a novel by Jules Verne, is more than a simple adventure story; it is a testament to human ingenuity, a celebration of the burgeoning technologies of the late 19th century, and a reflection on the nature of time and progress itself. Ostensibly a tale of an unflappable English gentleman attempting to circumnavigate the globe in a mere eighty days, the narrative invites us to question the limitations we place upon ourselves and the world. \n \n The novel was first published in Le Temps in 1872, seizing the imagination of a public captivated by rapid advancements in transportation brought about by railways and steamships. Verne expertly wove contemporary discussions about the feasibility of such a journey into his narrative, playing upon both the optimism and skepticism of the age. The idea of circumnavigating the globe in such a compressed timeframe, once relegated to the realm of fantasy, suddenly appeared tantalizingly within reach. \n \n Over time, Around the World in Eighty Days has transcended its status as mere adventure fiction. It has become a symbol of human ambition, a testament to the power of perseverance in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds. Stage adaptations, films, and countless other reinterpretations have kept the story alive, each reflecting the concerns and aspirations of its own era. Consider the numerous hot air balloon races that try to emulate Phileas Fogg's journey, or the modern-day attempts to break travel records, which suggests that the novel’s central theme—the relentless pursuit of the seemingly impossible—continues to resonate. \n \n The enduring mystique of Around the World in Eighty Days lies not just in its exciting plot but in its deeper exploration of cultural exchange, technological progress, and the unwavering spirit of adventure. It remains a powerful reminder that the boundaries of our wo
rld, both physical and metaphorical, are often self-imposed and are always ripe for challenge. What new journeys, both literal and figurative, will future generations undertake, inspired by Phileas Fogg’s audacious wager?
Jules Verne's Around the World in Eighty Days is not explicitly concerned with theology or metaphysics, but indirectly engages with profound philosophical questions concerning truth, belief, and the nature of reality. The very premise of the novel—Phileas Fogg's wager based on the timetable of a world journey—calls into question ideas surrounding certainty. Fogg's seemingly unwavering confidence echoes the question: "'If you check something enough times, can you be 100% certain about it?'" While Fogg meticulously plans and executes his journey, unforeseen circumstances constantly challenge his calculations, suggesting that absolute certainty is an illusion, perhaps unattainable even with the most rigorous planning. \n \n The diverse cultures encountered by Fogg and Passepartout during their travels prompt reflections on the relativity of truth and morality. The novel presents various belief systems and customs, raising the issue of whether "'moral truth is objective or relative to cultures.'" Through the eyes of the pragmatic Fogg and the initially bewildered Passepartout, readers confront different perspectives on what constitutes right and wrong. The question of adhering to traditions arises when considering the societal norms and expectations in the various countries they traverse: "'Should tradition limit moral progress?'" Verne subtly interrogates whether adherence to traditional mores always aligns with ethical behavior. \n \n The characters' interactions also touch upon the limitations of human understanding, even in the face of overwhelming evidence. The possibility of the impossible, embodied both by Fogg's incredible journey and the various exotic spectacles they witness, forces us to reconsider: "'Are there some truths humans will never be able to understand?'" Fogg's unwavering belief in his ability to complete the journey, despite encountering numerous
challenges, highlights the role of conviction in navigating the unknown. He embodies a certain type of truth seeking, one that embraces experience more than dogmatic answers. \n \n The theme of progress, central to the novel, also invites contemplation on the relationship between science, technology, and human experience and touches on the question: "'Should religious truth adapt to modern knowledge?'" Verne's portrayal of the late 19th century, a period of rapid technological advancement, underscores the transformative power of science and its potential to reshape our understanding of the world. The novel’s optimistic depiction of progress prompts reflection on whether science and technology are inherently beneficial. The question "'Is there purpose in evolution?'" can additionally be posed as a reflection, suggesting a certain teleology inherent in humanity's technological journey. \n \n Beyond immediate concerns, the novel encourages a deeper exploration of the nature of beauty and value. Could we suggest to ourselves as viewers and readers of the novel, that "'reading fiction can teach you real truths about life?'" Phileas Fogg’s journey, seemingly driven by a frivolous wager, reveals a deeper commitment to his word and concern for human life. His act of saving Aouda presents a tension in his decision, as it possibly threatens the success of his voyage, or "'Should personal loyalty ever override universal moral rules?'"
Paris
France